Search ::     [ Advanced ]
Username:   Password: Auto login next time?  

Business Rule Solutions : World Class Training For Critical Business Innovations

RuleXpress: The business tool for expressing and communication business rules.

JBossďż˝ Enterprise BRMS from Red Hat

IDIOM Software
 

 

 

 

     OLDIES ARCHIVES ...

ANALYSIS PARALYSIS JUST MAY SAVE YOUR LIFE

By Ronald G. Ross, September 1999

 

Many predators hunt based on movement. In fact, even with their keen eyesight, they cannot really "see" unless the prey itself moves. Consequently, many hunted animals are programmed literally to "freeze with fear." Not a bad move if it tends to save your life.

Recently, I had the chance to review a major-league mess at a large organization that didn't "freeze with fear." I won't go into all the details, but let's just say they got on with the coding phase of a large project way too early. The wounds are deep, and one way or another, the company will ooze red ink, its very lifeblood. Where did it go wrong? The usual no architecture, no business rules, no top-down business model.

On the software side, the company was sold a bill of goods. It was promised that a breakthrough software product could replace their legacy systems in four months. (Yes, they should have known better.) To go with that was a spiral "methodology" based on the mantra, "analyze a little, design a little, code a little, test a little." The company learned the hard way what that actually means in practice-rewrite a lot, for a very long time.

Projects out of control, and belief in the fairy godmother-these are nothing new. I know this has been said many times, but let me say it yet again. There are simply no silver bullets. You need to do a business model before you do your system design, and you need to do your system design before you start your coding. That is, unless you can afford to spend the rest of your life in rewrites and "maintenance."

So, what does "analysis paralysis" really indicate? Maybe that...

  • The business problem itself is hard. Do you believe that thinking about it in a coding language (or in IT system models) will make it easier?

  • You don't really know what the business problem is. In that case, the cure may prove a lot worse than the disease.

  • You can't get the right answers from the right people. Then what exactly are your chances of success?

  • You have significant differences of opinion about the business itself. Do you think programmers will make better choices?

  • The future is hard to predict. Do designers and programmers have better crystal balls?

  • You don't really know what is needed. So rolling the dice is the right answer?

  • There's actually no answer to the business problem as posed. Better rethink the business problem up front!

  • You're simply not smart enough to solve it. I doubt that, not if you get the right people together.

  • You don't have the right approach. That's the most likely one. Think architecture, business rules, and a top-down business model, and you'll be O.K.

So the next time you hear anyone say watch out for "analysis paralysis," I hope you will take pause. Just freeze-it may save your life. Somewhere close by there's probably a programmer poised to pounce on a keyboard.

© 1999, Ronald G. Ross.

November/December 1999
The Fin de Siegle Legacy Mindset
By Ronald G. Ross

September/October 1999
Analysis Paralysis Just May Save Your Life
By Ronald G. Ross

July/August 1999
If We Had Started Coding Already...
By Ronald G. Ross

May/June 1999
Your Core Business Processes Need a Rule Engine
By Ronald G. Ross

January/February 1999
Four Things Wrong with the Way We Develop Information Systems
By Ronald G. Ross

November/December 1998
Push-Type Data Hub vs. Pull-Type Data Warehouse
By Ronald G. Ross

September/October 1998
What Knowledge Management is About (And What it Has To Do With Business Rules)
By Ronald G. Ross

May/June 1998
The Next Great Leap Forward ~ About the Changes You See
By Ronald G. Ross

March/April 1998
Business Rules as Customer Interface
By Ronald G. Ross

January/February 1998
Components and Business Rules: Do They Connect?
By Ronald G. Ross

November/December 1997
The Policy Charter: A Small-Sized Picture of the Big Picture
By Ronald G. Ross

September/October 1997

Implementing Application Packages: Is There A Better Way?

By Ronald G. Ross


July/August 1997

'Why' is Why Business Rule Methodology is Different

By Ronald G. Ross


May/June 1997

Never-ending On-the-Job Training

By Ronald G. Ross


September/October 1996

Re-Usability in the Business Rule Approach

By Ronald G. Ross


March/April 1996

The Newest Idea In Business Rules: Rules Normalize!

By Ronald G. Ross


January/February 1996

An Open Letter to DBMS Vendors: We Need Active Database Systems

By Ronald G. Ross


May/June 1995

The Greatest Irony Of The Information Age: Business Rules

By Ronald G. Ross


November/December 1995

Business Rules: Knowledge For Knowledge Workers

By Ronald G. Ross


March/April 1994

"Play Ball!"

By Ronald G. Ross


November/December 1999 & January/February 2000

Enterprise Architecture: Issues, Ingibitors, and Incentives

By John A. Zachman


July/August & September/October 1999

Packages Don't Let You Off The Hook

By John A. Zachman


November/December 1988

The History Of Steam-Powered Ships

By Ronald G. Ross


January/February & March/April 1999

Life Is a Series of Trade-Offs and Change Is Accelerating!

By John A. Zachman


January/February 1994

"Business Rules, At What Cost?"

By Ronald G. Ross


November/December 1998

"Yes Virginia, There IS an Enterprise Architecture"

By John A Zachman


May/June 1994

Business Rules:  Birth of a Movement

By Ronald G. Ross


January/February 2000

Business Systems And Information Support Systems 

By John Hall


July/August 1998

Enterprise Architecture:  Looking Back and Looking Ahead

By John A. Zachman


July/August 1991

Why I Like the Zachman Framework Architecture"

By Ronald G. Ross


January/February 1998

The Framework for Enterprise Architecture (The 'Zachman Framework') and the Search for the Owner's View of Business Rules

By John A. Zachman


March/April 1997

Business Process Re-Engineering

By Ronald G. Ross

 

 

 about . . .

 RONALD G. ROSS

Ronald G. Ross is Principal and Co-Founder of Business Rule Solutions, LLC, where he actively develops and applies the IPSpeak methodology including RuleSpeak®, DecisionSpeak and TableSpeak.

Ron is recognized internationally as the "father of business rules." He is the author of ten professional books including the groundbreaking first book on business rules The Business Rule Book in 1994. His newest are:

Ron serves as Executive Editor of BRCommunity.com and its flagship publication, Business Rules Journal. He is a sought-after speaker at conferences world-wide. More than 50,000 people have heard him speak; many more have attended his seminars and read his books.

Ron has served as Chair of the annual International Business Rules & Decisions Forum conference since 1997., now part of the Building Business Capability (BBC) conference. He was a charter member of the Business Rules Group (BRG) in the 1980s, and an editor of its Business Motivation Model (BMM) standard and the Business Rules Manifesto. He is active in OMG standards development, with core involvement in SBVR.

Ron holds a BA from Rice University and an MS in information science from Illinois Institute of Technology. For more information about Mr. Ross, visit www.RonRoss.info, which hosts his blog. Tweets: @Ronald_G_Ross

 

 





[ Home ] [ Staff ] [ About BRC Publications ] [ Editorial Feedback ] [ About BRCommunity ]
[ Contributor's Guidelines ] [ Privacy Policy ] [ Technical Support ]