The Value of Decisions ~ New Ideas on the ROI of Business Rules

Ronald G.  Ross
Ronald G. Ross Co-Founder & Principal, Business Rule Solutions, LLC , Executive Editor, Business Rules Journal , and Co-Chair, Building Business Capability (BBC) Read Author Bio       || Read All Articles by Ronald G. Ross

Cost-justifying business rule initiatives has always been problematic.  In our experience, most have never been cost-justified at all -- rather they are undertaken because management comes to understand there is no viable alternative for some critical problem at hand.  And when the initiatives prove successful, there's no need to deconstruct their success.

But management is right to want analysis of the ROI, especially in companies without prior experience in the area.  Now there is a new way to think about the ROI of business rules.  Ironically, it comes from not looking at the rules at all.

In their new book, Smart (Enough) Systems[1], Neil Raden and James Taylor argue convincingly that it's some decision that rules can be used to make that provides the actual value-add for the business -- not the rules per se.  As I discussed in last month's column, they look at rules simply as the means to some important business end, some operational decision(s) to be made.  So the EDM message is that you shouldn't talk to business executives about the means (rules) when it's the ends (decisions) that really matter.  It's simply the wrong artifact.  Extrapolating, it's the ROI from the decision that should be examined if you want to do cost-benefit analysis, not from the rules per se.

Cost-benefit analysis under EDM is therefore based on the question, "What is the economic value to your company of its front-line decisions?"  These front-line decisions are everywhere -- so numerous, in fact, they are easy to miss.  Consider the following example:  You send promotional letters to 10,000 prospects.  Decision?

Of course, but as Raden and Taylor point out, not just one decision, but 10,000 decisions -- sending the letter to each individual prospect is in itself a decision.  Although the value to the company of each individual decision may be relatively low, here's the kicker -- they add up big-time!  Consider that you might also make the 10,000-prospect decision not once, but many times during a year.  Moreover, you might also make it through multiple channels.  The value of a particular kind of front-line decision is therefore generally as follows:

Value of a kind of front-line decision =

Value of each individual decision x Total number of decisions made

How do you measure the potential value of improving a front-line decision?[2]  In traditional thinking about cost-benefit, there are three broad approaches (in order from easiest to hardest):  Doing things cheaper, doing things faster, and doing things smarter.  Potential evaluation criteria for each of these approaches under EDM are given in the table below.

Table of Evaluation Criteria for Analyzing the Potential Cost-Benefit from Improving a Decision

Approach

Evaluation Criteria

Doing Things Cheaper

Determine savings from reduction or elimination of costs for:

  • Staff time to make decisions manually
  • Exception handling and associated research time
  • Iterative acquisition of missing or incorrect data
  • Fraud
  • Fines and penalties for non-compliance
  • Unnecessary inspections
  • Settlement disputes
  • Do-overs

Doing Things Faster

Determine the value of sales or deals potentially lost due to delays from:

  • Manual intervention, review, oversight, etc.
  • Queuing of work
  • Inability to make on-the-spot decisions

Doing Things Smarter

Determine the value to the company of its being able to:

  • Cross-sell or up-sell more effectively
  • Counteract a competitor's operational move quickly (e.g., to offer a new product, introduce new pricing incentives, etc.)
  • Exploit a new operational market opportunity quickly
  • Identify micro-market segments
  • Offer more personalized service
  • Provide a consistent cross-channel customer experience
  • Upsize or downsize more quickly
  • Remedy a shortfall in product or service delivery deftly so as to retain customers
  • Diagnose equipment or other failures at a very high rate of accuracy
  • Demonstrate compliance with little or no additional effort
  • Avoid litigation by ensuring compliant transactions in real time
  • Retain know-how when in-house experts are lost

To fully analyze ROI, you must consider not only potential value, but also cost.  How should costs be viewed under EDM?

Raden and Taylor make the crucial observation that a focus on EDM permits an organization to "decouple its expense growth from its revenue growth."  Here's what I take them to mean.  In traditional IT development, almost every corporate initiative, large or small, requires a concomitant, and more or less proportional, investment in systems development.  EDM liberates the organization from this lock-step paradigm.  By externalizing as much of the business logic as possible to business people, and providing a persistent, generalized infrastructure for making changes to that business logic, investment is spread across an ever-growing number of realized business opportunities.  To say that differently, you move business people away from competing for IT resources and toward managing rules.

References

[1] Neil Raden and James Taylor.  Smart (Enough) Systems:  How to Deliver Competitive Advantage by Automating Hidden Decisions.  Prentice-Hall (June 2007).  ISBN:  0132347962return to article

[2] In an appendix, Raden and Taylor introduce a new approach to evaluate the ROI of decisions, not discussed here, called Decision Yield.return to article

# # #

Standard citation for this article:


citations icon
Ronald G. Ross , "The Value of Decisions ~ New Ideas on the ROI of Business Rules" Business Rules Journal Vol. 8, No. 9, (Sep. 2007)
URL: http://www.brcommunity.com/a2007/b362.html

About our Contributor:


Ronald  G. Ross
Ronald G. Ross Co-Founder & Principal, Business Rule Solutions, LLC , Executive Editor, Business Rules Journal , and Co-Chair, Building Business Capability (BBC)

Ronald G. Ross is Principal and Co-Founder of Business Rule Solutions, LLC, where he actively develops and applies the IPSpeak methodology including RuleSpeak®, DecisionSpeak and TableSpeak.

Ron is recognized internationally as the "father of business rules." He is the author of ten professional books including the groundbreaking first book on business rules The Business Rule Book in 1994. His newest are:


Ron serves as Executive Editor of BRCommunity.com and its flagship publication, Business Rules Journal. He is a sought-after speaker at conferences world-wide. More than 50,000 people have heard him speak; many more have attended his seminars and read his books.

Ron has served as Chair of the annual International Business Rules & Decisions Forum conference since 1997., now part of the Building Business Capability (BBC) conference where he serves as Co-Chair. He was a charter member of the Business Rules Group (BRG) in the 1980s, and an editor of its Business Motivation Model (BMM) standard and the Business Rules Manifesto. He is active in OMG standards development, with core involvement in SBVR.

Ron holds a BA from Rice University and an MS in information science from Illinois Institute of Technology. Find Ron's blog on http://www.brsolutions.com/category/blog/. For more information about Ron visit www.RonRoss.info. Tweets: @Ronald_G_Ross

Read All Articles by Ronald G. Ross
Subscribe to the eBRJ Newsletter
In The Spotlight
 Silvie  Spreeuwenberg
 Jim  Sinur

Online Interactive Training Series

In response to a great many requests, Business Rule Solutions now offers at-a-distance learning options. No travel, no backlogs, no hassles. Same great instructors, but with schedules, content and pricing designed to meet the special needs of busy professionals.