Meta Matters Meta Here. Meta There. Meta Everywhere?

Ronald G.  Ross
Ronald G. Ross Co-Founder & Principal, Business Rule Solutions, LLC , Executive Editor, Business Rules Journal , and Co-Chair, Building Business Capability (BBC) Read Author Bio       || Read All Articles by Ronald G. Ross

As a young database professional in the mid-1970s I grew up on metadata — data that describes and defines other data.  In fact, I wrote one of the first books explaining it from a data-as-corporate-resource point of view in 1981.[1]

Who knew that in the 21st century there would ever be such a thing as big data, more dependent on metadata (if that's possible) than even 'regular' (transaction) data?!  Or that the metadata of phone conversations would become a central artifact in the struggle over civil liberties?!

Back then it never much occurred to me that there could be other kinds of 'meta'.  Well, except maybe metaphysics.  But you don't want to go there.  That's some realm beyond physics where physics isn't physics any more.[2]

Anyway, I was wrong about there not being other important kinds of 'meta'.

Other Meta's

In the 1990s I learned there was such a thing as meta-rules — rules that govern other rules.  That led to RuleSpeak® — rules for expressing rules in structured natural language.[3]  More recently it led to new thinking about the engineering of governance — business policies guiding the creation, approval, and dissemination of other business policies within an organization.  (Think rulebook management as governance infrastructure.)

I'm also pretty sure there could be metaprocesses — processes that transform other processes.  I got a large amount of (often quite confused) feedback about that question on social media, so let me save that issue for next month's column.

What other meaningful kinds of 'meta' are there?  It's fun to play with the question words where, who, and when, but I don't think there are any real meta's to those.  I could certainly be wrong, however.

I do have one strict rule for judging when you truly have something 'meta'.  My rule:

Some meaningful verb(s), not just a preposition, must be used in defining a 'meta' thing.

Examples we've already discussed:

  • Metadata — Data that describes and defines other data.  (You should not say just "data about data.")
  • Meta-rule — Rule that governs other rules.  (You should not say just "rules about rules.")
  • Metaprocess — Process that transforms other processes.  (You should not say just "processes about processes.")

Where else could you look for meta'sMerriam-Webster Unabridged Dictionary (MWUD) defines the kind of 'meta' we're discussing here as follows:[4]

3b : of a higher logical type — in nouns formed from names of disciplines and designating new but related disciplines such as can deal critically with the nature, structure, or behavior of the original ones

MWUD gives these examples (I added the verbs):

  • metalanguagelanguage for talking about other languages.
  • metatheory — theory for structuring other theories.
  • metasystemsystem that orchestrates other systems.

On this latter 'meta', be careful not to think of system in just the computer sense.  MWUD defines system in the sense I mean here as:

1 a : a complex unity formed of many often diverse parts subject to a common plan or serving a common purpose  b : an aggregation or assemblage of objects joined in regular interaction or interdependence : a set of units combined by nature or art to form an integral, organic, or organized whole : an orderly working totality : a coherent unification

So a system in that sense could include rules, roles, and many other things.  In other words it's much more than just a process.  The appropriate verb for meta-system is therefore orchestrates, not transforms.  That's an important distinction.

Meta-analysis.  In science & research literature these days you commonly read about meta-analysis.  An article in The Economist recently defined meta-analysis as "a technique which uses entire studies as single data points in an overarching statistical analysis."  In other words, an analysis that analyzes other analyses.

Meta-architecture.  I wonder if there is such a thing as meta-architecture — architecture for structuring architectures?  That's an interesting question.  I don't think so, but I could easily be wrong.

Meta-vocabulary.  I do know there's meta-vocabulary — vocabulary that speaks about other vocabularies.  That's a central feature of the OMG standard SBVR (Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules).[5]  I can tell you with great certainty that a meta-vocabulary is not the same thing as metadata — not by a long shot!  I can also tell you that in a knowledge economy, meta-vocabulary will ultimately prove much more important than metadata.

Meta-knowhow.  I believe there's also such a thing as meta-knowhow — knowhow that indicates how to organize other knowhow.  Unfortunately, as few business practitioners today know how important meta-knowhow is, as knew in the mid-1970s how important metadata was.

That will change.  And it won't take long.

Meta-knowhow for organizing core operational business knowhow[6] is essential to play effectively in the knowledge economy.  A significant part of that equation is simply reigning-in today's outlandish costs of operation (think IT budgets for starters).  Best practices already exist for the area.  Companies are paying a huge (and unsustainable) price for not engaging with them sooner rather than later.

The Ultimate Meta

As Table 1 presents there are yet other meaningful meta's.  Spending too much of your time in meta-meetings?

Table 1. More Meta's.

Meta

Definition

meta-model

model that represents other models

meta-robot

robot that manipulates other robots

meta-story

story that tells other stories

meta-discussion

discussion that expounds on how to have other discussions

meta-conference

conference that consults on how to hold other conferences

meta-meeting

meeting that discusses how to schedule and run other meetings[7]

meta-project

project that organizes other projects

meta-fear

fear that dwells on other fears[8]

The most interesting and powerful 'meta' of all, however, has to be meta-idea — an idea that conceives other ideas, one that enables the birthing (ideation[9]) of other ideas.  Examples:  (the ideas of) libraries, encyclopedias, and universal education.  These are the things that bootstrap whole cultures to a new level of intellectual empowerment.

In The Second Machine Age[10] the authors argue convincingly that with the internet's true coming of age we're living the next big meta-idea right now.  It's hard to argue the point.  You (the reader) are experiencing it at this very moment.  After all, how likely is it that we would be conceptualizing 'meta' together here if it weren't for the internet?!

P.S.  The concept 'meta' is itself actually a meta-idea.  Now there's a good brain teaser if you needed one more!

For further information, please visit BRSolutions.com      

References

[1]  Data Dictionaries and Data Administration:  Concepts and Practices for Data Resources Management, by Ronald G. Ross, AMACOM (American Management Association), New York (1981), 454pp.  The definition of metadata in the preceding sentence is straight from the glossary, pp. 432.  return to article

[2]   I mean the Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary definition 1b(1) : something that deals with what is beyond the physical or the experiential.  return to article

[3]  See www.RuleSpeak.com.  The RuleSpeak guidelines are free.  return to article

[4]  The MWUD meaning for meta- pertaining to metaphysics is different:
    3a: beyond : transcending
Besides metaphysics, MWUD's examples for that definition include metapsychosis, metageometry, metabiological, and metempirics (meta-empirics).  Let's not go any of those places!  The 'meta' I mean (definition 3b) is far more specific and useful, even if abstract.  Unfortunately, I believe many metaprocess proponents mean that (unscientific) 3a definition.  return to article

[5]  Refer to the SBVR Insider section on www.BRCommunity.com  return to article

[6]  For discussion of operational business know-how, refer to my posts:

[7]  Meta-meetings of course are notorious in the corporate lore of muddling businesses.  The definition might be more colorfully worded:  meeting whose only purpose is to plan other/more meetings.  return to article

[8]  On March 4, 1933, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt said in his first inaugural address "… let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself…."  The quote could be rephrased "the only thing we have to fear is meta-fear."  That does, however, lose something of the punch, doesn't it.  return to article

[9]  MWUD definition:  the process of entertaining and relating ideas  return to article

[10]  The Second Machine Age:  Work, Progress and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies, by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, W.W. Norton & Company, New York (2014), pp. 306.  return to article

# # #

Standard citation for this article:


citations icon
Ronald G. Ross , "Meta Matters Meta Here. Meta There. Meta Everywhere?" Business Rules Journal Vol. 15, No. 8, (Aug. 2014)
URL: http://www.brcommunity.com/a2014/b771.html

About our Contributor:


Ronald  G. Ross
Ronald G. Ross Co-Founder & Principal, Business Rule Solutions, LLC , Executive Editor, Business Rules Journal , and Co-Chair, Building Business Capability (BBC)

Ronald G. Ross is Principal and Co-Founder of Business Rule Solutions, LLC, where he actively develops and applies the IPSpeak methodology including RuleSpeak®, DecisionSpeak and TableSpeak.

Ron is recognized internationally as the "father of business rules." He is the author of ten professional books including the groundbreaking first book on business rules The Business Rule Book in 1994. His newest are:


Ron serves as Executive Editor of BRCommunity.com and its flagship publication, Business Rules Journal. He is a sought-after speaker at conferences world-wide. More than 50,000 people have heard him speak; many more have attended his seminars and read his books.

Ron has served as Chair of the annual International Business Rules & Decisions Forum conference since 1997., now part of the Building Business Capability (BBC) conference where he serves as Co-Chair. He was a charter member of the Business Rules Group (BRG) in the 1980s, and an editor of its Business Motivation Model (BMM) standard and the Business Rules Manifesto. He is active in OMG standards development, with core involvement in SBVR.

Ron holds a BA from Rice University and an MS in information science from Illinois Institute of Technology. Find Ron's blog on http://www.brsolutions.com/category/blog/. For more information about Ron visit www.RonRoss.info. Tweets: @Ronald_G_Ross

Read All Articles by Ronald G. Ross

Online Interactive Training Series

In response to a great many requests, Business Rule Solutions now offers at-a-distance learning options. No travel, no backlogs, no hassles. Same great instructors, but with schedules, content and pricing designed to meet the special needs of busy professionals.