Search ::     [ Advanced ]
Username:   Password: Auto login next time?  

RuleXpress: The business tool for expressing and communication business rules.

Business Rule Solutions : World Class Training For Critical Business Innovations

JBossïż½ Enterprise BRMS from Red Hat

IDIOM Software
 

 

 

 

     BURLTON ARCHIVES ...
untitled

In Process

Business Process Management:  An Improved Guidance Creation Process

by Roger T. Burlton

Knowledge and Rules

One way of describing a business process is to say that inputs are processed into outputs of value according to guides using enablers when stakeholders trigger activity -- that is, inappropriate, insufficient, or non-existent guidance and ill-prepared or ineffective enabling mechanisms will lead to poor business performance due to process breakdown.  Clearly, knowledge is critical, and it is reflected in the process' guides and enablers' content and their design. 

The measures associated with rules can be viewed in the same manner as knowledge as a guide to a process outcome -- that is, in terms of process quality or the cost of non-conformance.  In this way, the cost of an inappropriate rule is the total downstream cost of not having the right rule available.  This includes extra cost or time, lost business due to customer dissatisfaction, extra work to repair or correct, etc.  The cost of taking too long to change a rule is the cost of lost opportunity that would have been realized if the rule were to be changed immediately rather than after a lag. 

In any case, the cost or value of a rule (as with all knowledge) is through its impact on the total set of processes where it is used.  This argues strongly for rule independence and the establishment of cross-reference mechanisms and a culture of fast change -- sharing new rules responsively -- and helping maintain the utility of the business processes.

A Process for Keeping Knowledge Current

What's needed is an ongoing process (one that does not exist in many organizations) to take the learnings from everyday experience with today's processes and rules and produces renewed ones so that improved performance is made possible the next time through.

If there is no specific knowledge management process to take these lessons learned and evaluate them and change the capabilities on a regular basis, either performance of the process will stagnate with no improvement or will degrade due to the process becoming out-of-touch with a changing set of stakeholder expectations. 

What is needed is a formal process of improving the capability, including updating the rules and the enablers within which they are embodied or embedded.  This Improved Guidance Creation Process will require resources and a commitment in a process-managed environment.  With new rules published and communicated regularly and with enablers renewed regularly, improved performance will be delivered, staff will continuously learn, and the organization will adapt and thrive.

Key Activities

While in operational mode, the key activities in the Improved Guidance Creation Process are:

  • Analyze lessons learned regarding capabilities -- especially processes, knowledge, and rules from process execution and stakeholder feedback.
  • Understand current business drivers and strategic intent.
  • Identify stakeholders and their expectations.
  • Re-examine processes' performance gaps.
  • Analyze processes using root cause analysis to examine rules and other capabilities.
  • Update process design, including guides and enablers.
  • Determine renewed rules for renewed processes, and gain approval for changes.
  • Identify enablers for knowledge and rule distribution and access (embedded or embodied).
  • Build or renew enablers.
  • Communicate new capability.
  • Implement new capability.

These activities work for ongoing business process operation.  For larger changes with a more significant impact, a more formal overall approach is required that starts with strategy and delivers a more formal program of integrated change based on holistic process analysis.

Independent but Aligned

In closing, nothing stands alone:  not strategy, not data, not process, not technology, not knowledge and not rules.  To ensure adaptability and ease of change, all of these should be independent of one another but aligned with the business direction and stakeholders' needs.  Clearly all aspects must work in concert and each must be tuned to support the objectives of the business overall.  The job of business processes is to provide that link.


standard citation for this article:
Roger T. Burlton, "Business Process Management:  An Improved Guidance Creation Process," Business Rules Journal, Vol. 6, No. 9 (Sep. 2005), URL:  http://www.BRCommunity.com/a2005/b248.html  

October 2012
An Introduction to "The Business Process Manifesto"

October 2011
BPM Critical Success Factors: Lessons Learned from Successful BPM Organizations

August 2010
Who Cares About Your Business Processes? (Part 2) 'Stakeholder Analysis in BPM' in General

June 2010
Who Cares About Your Business Processes? (Part 1): My Introduction to Process Thinking

February 2010
Process Project Perspectives: Hope is not a Strategy and Ignorance is Not Bliss

January 2010
Process Project Perspectives: Outsiders and Insiders

October 2009
BPM Points of View

September 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 7): BPM Methodology Fundamentals

August 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 6): BPM as Common Practice

July 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 5): The Internal Perspective

June 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 4): The New Common Sense

May 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 3): Back to the Future

April 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 2): Evolution of a Revolution

February 2008
BPM ~ From Common Sense to Common Practice (Part 1): Process Performance Challenges

December 2006
Having a BPM Maturity Model is Important for Long Lasting BPM Success, by Michael Melenovsky and Jim Sinur

October 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 10)

September 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 9)

August 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 8)

July 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 7)

June 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 6)

May 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 5)

April 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (Part 4)

March 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (part 3)

February 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (part 2)

January 2006
Best Practices of Process Management: The Top Ten Principles (part 1)

September 2005
Business Process Management: An Improved Guidance Creation Process

August 2005
Business Process Management: The Heart of Organizational Capability

July 2005
Effective Business Transformation through Process Management

 

 

 about . . .

 ROGER T. BURLTON, P.Eng., CMC

photo

Roger is a co-founder of BPTrends Associates, the services firm of the world-leading BPTrends.com knowledge portal. He started the pioneering Process Renewal Group (PRG) in 1993. He is regarded globally as a thought leader and dynamic practitioner who can bring reason, clarity, and practicality to ways of managing complex BPM challenges. Roger’s insights can be found in his acclaimed book, Business Process Management: Profiting from Process, and other publications including his columns in BPTrends.com and BRCommunity.com.

 

 





[ Home ] [ Staff ] [ About BRC Publications ] [ Editorial Feedback ] [ About BRCommunity ]
[ Contributor's Guidelines ] [ Privacy Policy ] [ Technical Support ]